Entertainment
Google And Meta Found Liable In Watershed Social Media Trial
Google, owner of YouTube, and Meta, owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, had been found liable in a notable case on childhood social media addiction. A jury in Los Angeles, California found that the two tech companies had deliberately built addictive social media applications that harmed the mental health of the 20-year-old plaintiff, according to BBC News. Both Meta and Google said they disagree with the court’s verdict and would be appealing the decision, releasing separate statements to news organizations about the case. The plaintiff in the case, known as “Kaley” or “KGM”, was awarded $6 million in damages, $3 million each in compensatory and punitive damages, with Meta expected to pay 70% of damages and Google the leftover 30% owed. The ruling could have major implications in many similar social media cases currently being tried across the United States.
Although Google was a defendant in the case through its platform YouTube, the case focused primarily on Meta, specifically because of Instagram. Notably, Meta chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified before the court in February in his first appearance in front of a jury. Snap and TikTok settled with the plaintiff for undisclosed amounts before the case went to trial. The lawsuit for “Kailey” is the first in a region-wide consolidated case (where a court merges multiple lawsuits) of roughly 2,500 against the four tech and social media giants, Meta, Google, Snap and TikTok. In an unrelated but notable case, Elon Musk’s XAI, parent company of X (formerly Twitter) is currently being sued by the city of Baltimore, Maryland over allegations of sexually explicit images generated by its AI agent Grok.
The plaintiff said that she started using Instagram at nine years old and was using YouTube at age six, without being blocked from using either platform. She went on to claim that she stopped interacting with her family and began having symptoms of anxiety and depression at age 10. She was reportedly diagnosed with both conditions later by a therapist. According to the Associated Press, Meta argued that the mental health struggles faced by Kaley were unrelated to her social media use. Lawyers for YouTube argued that their platform was more like television than a social media platform, also pointing to company data they said showed that Kaley’s usage of the platform had declined over time. Both companies emphasized the safety features of their platforms, echoing similar statements from Zuckerberg during his February testimony.
The Los Angeles case comes just a day after a jury in New Mexico ordered Meta to pay $375 million. The company was found liable for misleading users about the safety of its platforms Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. Another California court case involving social media platforms and alleged harm to minors is also scheduled to start this month. The UK, Australia and Indonesia are also restricting access to social media for children. Indonesia will ban social media for children under 16 starting March 28, with a similar law for people under 16 in Australia already in place. In the UK, a pilot program testing social media time limits, digital curfews and bans is currently underway. Slovenia, Spain, France, Germany and Denmark are also moving to ban social media for minors. Today’s ruling is likely to influence other court cases around the country as governments around the world are considering limiting social media access for children.
