Money
Logan Paul and KSI’s Prime Hydration: The Creator Beverage Blueprint
When Logan Paul and KSI launched Prime Hydration, the product quickly became one of the most discussed creator-led consumer brands. The drink’s trajectory from an internet sensation to a major beverage competitor reveals a blueprint for how digital influence can be converted into real-world sales. It also highlights the challenges inherent in sustaining that success once the initial hype fades.
Prime Hydration was introduced in 2022 by Paul, the American YouTube personality-turned-boxer, and KSI, a British YouTuber and a part of social media collective Sidemen. Both had achieved international fame at relatively the same time and both marketed the beverage through their own channels and social platforms rather than relying on traditional launch tactics. The brand positioned itself as a hydration product that offered a healthier alternative to sugary sports drinks. Bottles featured ingredients like electrolytes, B vitamins, branched-chain amino acids, and about ten percent coconut water. Zero sugar and bold, bright packaging helped the product appeal to a younger audience already attuned to social media trends
Explosive Growth
In its first year on the market, Prime’s growth was explosive. By the year 2023, the brand had generated roughly $1.2 billion in revenue, a milestone that Logan Paul reportedly described as “insane” given that it was achieved by two YouTubers entering a highly competitive industry. Paul claimed that Prime was “the fastest growing hydration beverage in history.” Unfortunately, demand outpaced supply early on. Retailers like Walmart and Target struggled to keep stock on shelves, while social media feeds filled with videos of fans searching for bottles and posting reactions to the product’s colorful flavors. This kind of user-generated content served as free advertising and expanded the brand’s reach far beyond the founders’ own audiences.
Prime’s initial success also generated unusual secondary market behavior. Limited availability led to reselling, with some buyers offering bottles at high prices online and in informal markets. This scarcity strategy amplified the buzz around the drink, making its acquisition feel like an achievement rather than a purchase. Paul and KSI used their social platforms to announce and promote launches directly to millions of followers, bypassing traditional advertising channels. Their personal involvement in showcasing the product made Prime appear as something they had created, not just endorsed.
New flavors from Prime were marketed as limited edition drinks, often selling out quickly and encouraging consumers to talk about their acquisitions online. This tactic helped maintain high visibility and repeated social media impressions without a massive ad budget. Partnerships with established sports organizations added credibility beyond internet buzz. Prime secured deals with top-tier sports teams and leagues, such as becoming the hydration partner for major organizations and being featured in global events. These collaborations placed the product in front of audiences that might not follow either Paul or KSI directly.
By late 2023, Prime had reportedly sold over a billion bottles worldwide and challenged established players in key markets. At Walmart it even surpassed Gatorade as the top-selling hydration beverage according to some reports. This rapid expansion demonstrated the potential power of influencer-led products when paired with strategic distribution and partnership deals. The brand’s reach extended internationally, with distribution in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and beyond. Its rapid adoption made it one of the fastest growing brands in beverage history, a fact Paul highlighted in interviews discussing the early sales figures.
Decline and Rebranding
After the initial burst of growth, Prime faced challenges sustaining momentum. In the U.K., revenues dropped sharply by 70 percent between 2023 and 2024, a signal that the intense early demand was hard to maintain without continuous novelty. Similar declines were seen in the U.S. market, where sales softened as social media buzz faded and consumer habits shifted. As Prime moved from the launch phase into standard commercial competition, it faced rising competition from legacy brands and growing consumer expectations around product performance and variety. The company has tried to recapture market share by releasing new items like protein shakes, which they released in 2026.
Paul and KSI’s blueprint showcased how social influence and community engagement can be harnessed to drive product adoption. They demonstrated that direct marketing to millions who already trust and follow the founders is a powerful tool. But the challenges Prime now faces remind future creator-entrepreneurs that long-term business success is not guaranteed by digital popularity alone.
Maybe you’ve seen your favorite streamer shout out their sponsor live. Perhaps you’ve witnessed a whole event on Twitch, or an entire set for a podcast, bought for and branded by a sponsor. Brands are paying streamers millions for single sponsored streams because a handful of live creators now function like prime‑time TV events, offering guaranteed reach and measurable performance in a media landscape where everything else is fragmented and skippable.
Live-streaming is now a pillar of the creator economy, which itself is reportedly valued in the hundreds of billions of dollars, with spending on advertisements doubling in 2025. Goldman Sachs estimates that that valuation could reach $500 billion by 2027. Platforms like Twitch, YouTube Live, Instagram Live and Kick turned individual channels into always‑on shows with loyal, repeat audiences who treat streams more like an active watching experience. In that environment, a sponsored stream stops being “an ad” and starts functioning as a co‑produced live special where the brand is written directly into the script. Whether it’s fashion brands running TikTok Shop events, beauty labels hosting Instagram Lives, or podcasters doing sponsored streaming, brands are spending big on sponsored content.
The Mathematics Behind Sponsorships
A common rule of thumb is to price a sponsored stream by taking the average number of live viewers and charging around 1 dollar per viewer per hour. So if a streamer averages about 1,000 viewers, they might make a few thousand dollars for a typical session, while a creator with tens or hundreds of thousands of live viewers could command into six‑figure range for a single multi‑hour stream. There are only a handful of streamers who can reliably pull stadium‑sized audiences and move culture in real time, which creates scarcity and bidding wars. That pressure, stacked on top of performance expectations, is how you get to headlines about brands spending millions for a single day of airtime.
The paradox of the sponsored stream economy is that rigorous measurement often makes these deals look terrible on a spreadsheet. A recent study by professors Ilya Morozov, at the Kellogg School at Northwestern University and Yufeng Huang of the University of Rochester of tens of thousands of Twitch channels between 2021 and 2021 found that sponsored game streams produced a median return on investment around minus ninety‑five percent for publishers. Organic streams of games actually did more to increase active players on platforms like Steam than paid placements did, especially for big, already‑known titles.
Yet spend keeps flowing in, because the value brands chase isn’t only direct sales during or after the broadcast. Live commerce adds yet another layer: brands often pay a hosting fee plus performance bonuses tied to gross merchandise value, conversion rate, or units sold during the session. Additionally, for indie games and smaller studios, sponsored streams do sometimes generate positive, large returns by making otherwise invisible titles discoverable. And for bigger brands, a splashy activation is often justified as a brand‑marketing expense.
Campaigns vs. Sponsorships
There are two different distinct types of “sponsored streams”. Awareness campaigns usually involve bigger budgets, where a brands pays a large creator primarily for exposure These deals skew toward large, established channels. Performance‑based sponsorships on the other hand, are often using cost‑per‑acquisition or revenue‑share models to reward creators for sign‑ups, downloads, or purchases driven during the stream. Those performance deals create a floor of sustainable income across the long tail, while the awareness deals create the eye‑watering seven‑figure outliers at the top.
What makes livestreaming sponsorships uniquely potent is the relationship between streamer and audience. In a paper about streaming and monetization published in Social Media + Society, authors Mark R. Johnson and Jamie Woodcock conclude that streamers actively gamify monetization, building rituals around donations, subs, and on‑stream milestones that invite fans into the business side of the channel. Over time, viewers don’t just watch; they feel like stakeholders whose emotional investment is tied to the creator’s success, and who are accustomed to money changing hands in public.
That same dynamic shows up in podcast communities, wellness Q&A streams, and live shopping shows where hosts interact by name with repeat buyers. When a creator raises millions for charity in a single event or collaborates deeply with a sponsor, viewers are often proud to participate. Brands are betting that a streamer’s endorsement will feel less like an interruption and more like a recommendation from a friend the audience has spent hundreds of hours with.
The Next Phase
As more money floods in, the sponsored stream economy is colliding with questions of disclosure, regulation, and sustainability. Large‑scale analyses of Twitch data show that over two‑thirds of prominent streamers have done at least one developer‑sponsored stream, underscoring how normalized paid promotion has become. Regulators are tightening disclosure rules, and more media‑savvy audiences are making hidden ads harder to get away with, pushing brands toward more transparent, co‑created campaigns that can withstand scrutiny.
When Emma Chamberlain launched Chamberlain Coffee in late 2019, the company didn’t feel like a celebrity licensing deal or a quick cash-grab from a high profile influencer. Chamberlain had been talking about coffee for years in her videos, often treating it as part of her daily routine rather than a curated lifestyle prop. The company’s first offerings were simple: bags of beans, cold brew packets, and an online storefront that leaned more playful than polished. What followed has been a slow expansion into one of the more visible creator-founded consumer brands of the past five years.
Emma Chamberlain made a name for herself in the mid-to-late 2010s through her unscripted YouTube vlogging. Her videos were sometimes travel diaries, often sprinkled with candid scenes of her trying new cafés or tinkering with cold brew at home. Those early moments built a loyal audience that trusted her voice and tastes. When she decided to turn that love of coffee into a business, her base of millions followed her transition not as a corporate pivot but as a natural evolution of her personal interests.
Chamberlain Coffee began as a direct-to-consumer business, built for an audience that already associated its founder with a certain kind of casual authenticity. Chamberlain’s YouTube career was defined by her rejection of the high-gloss influencer template. Her appeal came from how unproduced everything felt, even when it was carefully edited. Coffee was a recurring detail in that world, and the brand grew naturally out of it. By 2022, the company had started moving beyond internet novelty and influencer hype. According to multiple reports, Chamberlain Coffee raised $7 million in Series A funding, led by Blazar Capital and Chamberlain herself, as the company pushed further into retail and scaled distribution. Quoted in Forbes, Chamberlain described the company as an extension of her personal tastes rather than a detached business venture. This approach has been central to Chamberlain Coffee’s marketing approach from the beginning of the brand.
Chamberlain Coffee’s product line has expanded steadily. The brand now sells flavored blends, matcha, instant coffee and tea sticks, and branded accessories, like whisks, cups and bags. All of their items arrive in bright packaging that feels closer to Gen Z design language than traditional specialty coffee minimalism. The company has also emphasized sourcing and sustainability in its messaging, including partnerships that support farming communities. By 2024, the company was making a reported $20 million dollars in annual revenue. The brand forecasted $33 million dollars of revenue in 2025.
In recent years, the company has landed distribution in major chains including Target, Walmart, Whole Foods, and Sprouts, shifting the brand from something ordered online by fans into something encountered casually in grocery aisles. Starting with a limited edition online-only collaboration with lemonade company Swoon in 2022, followed by a collaboration with dairy-free creamer Nutpods the same year. In 2023, the brand then dropped an exclusive release at Walmart in 2022 of its plant-based coffee drinks, which was described by Chamberlain Coffee’s then-CEO Christopher Gallant as “a big moment for the brand”. In 2025, Chamberlain Coffee opened its first permanent café location in Los Angeles at Westfield Century City. The opening drew long lines, shifting towards a traditional retail environment where the product has to stand on its own.
Chamberlain Coffee also fits into a larger pattern of creators building consumer brands with longer shelf lives than merchandise lines. Unlike limited apparel releases, coffee is a repeat-purchase category, and the company has positioned itself around everyday use rather than collectibles. Chamberlain Coffee has distinguished itself from the standard branded t-shirt many creators sell. The company’s growth has come through incremental product additions and wider availability, not a single breakout moment.
Five years after launch, Chamberlain Coffee occupies a different space than it did in 2019. What began as a creator-led online shop is now a nationally distributed beverage brand. The brand has fully legitimized itself with venture capital backing, multiple major retail partners, and a first step into café operations. Chamberlain remains the face of the company, and became co-CEO in 2024, but the business itself has expanded into a standalone presence in grocery aisles and shopping centers well beyond her original audience.
In November 2024, Twitch streamer Kai Cenat launched one of the most ambitious livestream projects in the platform’s history. “Mafiathon 2” was a subathon that ran continuously for an entire month, the whole of November. With a trailer loosely inspired by the Sopranos and featuring Kim Kardashian, the month of streaming was quite the spectacle. Cenat streamed around the clock, encouraging users to subscribe to his channel, promising that twenty percent of revenues would go towards a pledge to build a school in Lagos, Nigeria. The results shattered previous benchmarks on Twitch for subscriptions, viewership, and engagement, giving the livestreaming industry a rare and measurable case study in audience intensity.
Cenat’s total subscriber count at the end of the stream was over 725,000, according to the BBC. This more than doubled the previous record of roughly 326,252 subscribers set by VTuber Ironmouse during her own marathon event earlier in 2024. To sustain a subathon, each new subscription typically adds more time to a countdown clock that would otherwise run down and end the broadcast, creating an incentive to subscribe. Cenat kept the broadcast going for the full 30 days of November, and the subathon format was at the heart of that extended schedule.
A closer look at the numbers reveals the scale of the event. According to data mentioned by Time Magazine in their profile of Cenat for their 2025 Top 100 Creators list, the stream accumulated tens of millions of unique viewers over its run, with estimates as high as 50 million. According to Time, revenue from the subscriptions alone was calculated at “more than $3.6 million” for Cenat after accounting for typical platform fees and regional pricing. Concurrent viewership numbers were equally staggering, with peaks consistently in the hundreds of thousands. On one notable day in the marathon, peak viewership approached 643,000 concurrent viewers, placing the broadcast among the most watched on Twitch in 2024.
Audience engagement was not limited to subscriptions and raw viewership numbers. Mafiathon 2 also generated a massive amount of total watch time on Twitch. According to analytics from tracking platform Dexerto, Cenat’s marathon accounted for a large share of total hours watched on Twitch for November 2024. One report indicated that the stream alone was responsible for over 80 million hours watched, more than five percent of all hours streamed on Twitch that month.
Twitch typically takes a revenue share of around 30 percent for subscriptions. With an estimated 728,000 subscribers paying at least the base subscription rate, and after Twitch’s cut, Cenat had estimated earnings of around $3.6 million from sub revenue alone. This excludes additional income from donations, ad revenue, and higher tier subscriptions, all of which would add to the total earnings.
The involvement of celebrities also amplified viewership. During the marathon Cenat hosted guests such as Snoop Dogg, Lil Uzi Vert, and Serena Williams, among others. These appearances created breakpoints in the schedule that attracted even more attention from both his existing community and outside viewers. In addition to raw metrics, the impact of Mafiathon 2 on Twitch’s narrative for 2024 was significant. The streamer was highlighted in Twitch’s own year end reviews, and Cenat’s channel was named among top performers on the platform. These mentions reflect the numerical dominance of the broadcast in a year that saw many other high profile events and livestreams across gaming and entertainment categories.
Overall, the numbers behind Mafiathon 2 make it one of the most noteworthy experiments in livestreaming history. It set new subscription standards, pushed viewership into previously unseen territory, and provided a measurable example of what sustained viewer engagement can look like in live broadcast environments. The scale of the marathon, the retention of audience attention, and the monetary results together illustrate a new benchmark for content creators on Twitch and similar platforms.
