Entertainment
Beast Industries Sued By Former Employee
Former Beast Industries employee Lorrayne Mavromatis, who worked at MrBeast’s (Jimmy Donaldson) entertainment company from 2022 to 2025, filed a civil lawsuit in US federal court in North Carolina, headquarters of Beast Industries. In her lawsuit Mavromatis is seeking damages from the organization for alleged sexual harassment, gender-discrimination, workplace violations and wrongful termination. Mavromatis says she was fired after returning from maternity leave. She also alleges that she was demoted before being fired. Beast Industries has denied the claims of the lawsuit, calling them “categorically false”.
This is not Beast Industries’ first controversy with former employees and associates, as the organization (and MrBeast himself) previously cut ties with an original cast member after she was accused of grooming a minor (an investigation by an independent law firm later found no evidence of misconduct, according to the New York Times). MrBeast has also been accused of fostering a hostile work environment, going as far back as 2018, according to multiple reports. In two separate instances, two former video editors accused him of having a toxic workplace. Additionally, five former contestants on MrBeast and Amazon Prime’s reality competition show Beast Games sued, alleging a variety of different forms of mistreatment, including sexual harassment. That lawsuit is still ongoing.
In Mavromatis’ lawsuit, she alleges a pattern of discriminatory culture at Beast Industries. Mavromatis spoke with Vulture about her experience at the company and her lawsuit. Beast Industries denies the claims of the lawsuit. A representative from Beast Industries told BBC Newsbeat that the claims by Mavromatis were “categorically false” and described the lawsuit as a “clout-chasing complaint”. Donaldson himself has declined to comment on the lawsuit at present.
Mavromatis, an influencer, said that she moved to Greenville, North Carolina with her husband, and was hired as Head of Instagram at Beast Industries. In her first year, she was promoted twice, making her the only woman executive in the company. According to Vulture, the allegations of a toxic environment date back to the company’s original employee handbook, and also being “excluded from otherwise all-male meetings, demeaned in front of colleagues, harassed”, in addition to what Mavromatis claims were retaliations (including being demoted and then fired) for complaints about such behavior. According to Fast Company, a Beast Industries representative said that it has messages, documents, and witness testimony contradicting her claims
In the lawsuit, Mavromatis charges that sexual harassment of female employees was “both condoned and/or perpetuated by their supervisors”, citing personal examples including claims that Beast Industries then-CEO, James Warren (also MrBeast’s cousin), told her that she was “a beautiful woman and her appearance had a certain sexual effect on Jimmy”, and also makes multiple claims about “strange” behavior by Donaldson himself, and additional inappropriate behavior by Warren in one-on-one meetings.
In 2023, because of allegations of a producer making “unwelcome comments about their appearance and close touching”, Mavromatis complained to Donaldson’s mother, then-head of Human Resources Sue Parisher. According to the lawsuit, a company-commissioned investigation found the claims ‘unsubstantiated,’ which Mavromatis disputes.
The lawsuit alleges that afterwards, Mavromatis was demoted to social media manager for merchandise at Beast Industries. In 2025, after finding out she was pregnant, Mavromatis also claims that her employment rights were violated when she asked for maternity leave, a claim that Beast Industries denies. The company responded with her signature on an employee handbook that they said included parental-leave policies. Additionally, Mavromatis says that her mother filmed her joining a work call from her hospital bed while she was in labor, and that she was informally working again just three weeks after giving birth, including a difficult trip to her home country, Brazil. Beast Industries says that Mavromatis “volunteered” for the work trip. Finally, she also claimed that she was fired just three weeks after fully returning to work, and alleges mental health issues including depression and some suicidal thoughts.
Mavromatis told Vulture that fans of MrBeast “are only seeing what Jimmy wants to be shown, and that’s just this amazing philanthropic guy that cares about people and just has this big heart. But the people that are there helping him be who he is today, working countless hours in the back, they’re not taken care of.” This is one of multiple allegations of a hostile work environment and inappropriate acts by staff and cast members working with MrBeast. It is also another all-too common claim related to misconduct and mistreatment in the “creator economy”.
Beast Industries, in addition to denying her claims, told the BBC that the company “had ‘extensive’ evidence including messages, documents and witness testimony that ‘unequivocally refutes’ Mavromantis’ claims.’ A representative later added: “We will not submit to opportunistic lawyers looking to manufacture a payday from us.” According to Deadline, lawyers for Beast Industries are seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed.
Dutch influencer Joann van den Herik went viral this week after she called Coachella the “influencer Olympics” on TikTok, describing her experience of the festival as one less about the music and more about creators fighting to get the best angles while staring at their phones. She is not wrong. One week into the 25th anniversary edition of Coachella and it’s clear that the creator economy ran the whole thing. Here’s what happened and what to expect this weekend.
The most significant creator moment of the weekend belonged to Addison Rae, who played the main Coachella Stage on Saturday evening in what was her first full-length solo set at the festival. Rae, who started as a TikTok creator before pivoting to music, performed ahead of headliner Justin Bieber and delivered what she called “The Fame and Glory Show,” a reworked version of her recent tour. The set opened with “Diet Pepsi” and built toward a standout “Aquamarine” performance alongside Maddie Ziegler. Rae took a moment to address years of skepticism about her transition from social media to pop music, telling the crowd that her supporters should know she loves them, and insulting her detractors. She returns for weekend two on April 18.
One of Coachella’s most significant events from the first week of 2026 was Justin Bieber’s contentious, YouTube-themed performance. With a laptop, a microphone, and the occasional guitarist, Bieber spent part of his set projecting his own videos onto a big screen and singing along-side them. Bieber’s stripped-down show was him having fun with his own viral moments and concerns for his well-being after some publicized antics, tour cancellations and health concerns. Leaked footage of rehearsals for Bieber’s performance caused resold ticket prices for Coachella to spike, with prices peaking at $4,000 for tickets that originally cost $650, as Bieber is scheduled to perform again this Saturday.
Meanwhile, high profile Twitch streamer Lacy (Nick Fosco) brought his camera to Coachella over the weekend. The 23-year-old, who is ranked among Twitch’s top 15 streamers in 2026, has been on a collision course with live event restrictions for weeks. In late March, Lacy and fellow streamer Sketch were ejected from a courtside seat at the NCAA March Madness Elite Eight game between Iowa and Illinois after security caught them livestreaming the game, which violates the NCAA’s broadcast rights agreements. The tension between streamers who want to broadcast everything and rights holders who have paid billions for exclusivity is becoming one of the defining conflicts in live entertainment. At Coachella, where YouTube holds the official livestream rights across seven stages, that tension is even more pronounced. Creators attending the festival can post clips and vlogs, but live broadcasting of performances runs into legal territory fast, and the festival is known for being stringent with limiting unofficial live-streamed and clipped videos.
Off the stage, the influencer economy was operating at full capacity. Content creator Sam Mintesnot documented her attempt to get into the festival without a ticket, posting across her platforms in hopes of scoring a brand invitation. It worked. YouTube invited her two days before the festival started. That kind of hustle is now a recognized pathway into Coachella for creators who do not have the budget for passes that start at $820 for a single day on resale. In another example, Sydney Morgan, a creator known for special effects makeup, bought her own ticket and traveled to Indio with a group of fellow creators, renting an Airbnb selected specifically for how it would look on camera and built a filming itinerary around the group’s content schedules. They arrived a full day before the music started so they could shoot.
YouTube leaned hard into the creator angle this year. The platform’s “Watch With” feature returned, letting creators provide live commentary and reactions alongside the official Coachella livestream from their own channels. The company also hosted creators at its Backstage Studio on the festival grounds, where influencers like Alix Earle were photographed. Earle, who launched her skin care brand Reale Actives just weeks before the festival, attended multiple brand events and posted outfit content that went viral almost immediately.
The brand activation circuit surrounding Coachella has become its own festival, with brands like Kourtney Kardashian Barker’s Poosh, Neutrogena, TikTok Shop and many other marketplaces and companies hosting events. Reports also surfaced of brands rescinding influencer invitations at the last minute, and multiple creators said their Airbnb bookings were canceled by hosts looking to rebook at higher prices during festival weekend.
Weekend two begins April 17, with the same lineup running a second time. Addison Rae will perform again. The creators will return with fresh outfits and new content plans. And somewhere in the crowd, someone will be livestreaming something they probably should not be.
Snapchat rolled out the yellow carpet for their inaugural award show, the Snappys? The event was hosted at the company’s headquarters in Santa Monica, California. For the Snappys, the Snapchat building was converted into a theatre and event space, hosting top content creators invited to the event and nominated for awards. The Snappys were streamed live last night on the Snapchat app. So who took home awards and what bumps in the road happened at the event?
Matt Friend, a comedian known for his impressions, hosted the awards show. Friend has performed at previous Snapchat events and has an active following on the platform. In his monologue, Friend made jokes poking fun at the recent abundance of award shows in his monologue (TikTok had their first award show in December) and at content recycled between social media platforms.
Kehlani was scheduled to perform but did not attend, cancelling for personal reasons. Some top influencers did attend the event including nominees like David Dobrik, Dixie D’Amelio, JoJo Siwa and Harry Jowsey, but turnout was lower than expected. Roughly half of all Snappy winners did not even attend the event. Lifetime Achievement winner DJ Khaled accepted his achievement award virtually, also announcing Kehlani’s scrapped performance. Additionally, some social media users reported issues trying to watch the show live on the app.
Despite the setbacks, the award show was still a relative success, with Dobrik, Kylie Jenner and former NBA player Dwight Howard winning awards. Dobrik dedicated his win to Snapchat Head of Content Partnerships Jim Shepherd. Shepherd was quoted in Snapchat’s press release for the award show toting the platform’s commitment to creators. During the event, it was announced that paid creator subscriptions would be available to all Snap users. Winners took home a golden statue of the company’s ghost logo à la the Oscars.
2026 Snappys Winners
Best Use of Creative Tools – Zaina Sesay
Best Storyteller – Rachel Levin
Spotlight MVP – AdamW
Top Lens Creator – Mohamad el Asmar
Community Builder – Cheyenne Davis
One To Watch – Ella Moncrief
Off-Platform Buzz – Nic Vans
Comeback Star- Kylie Jenner
Breakout Creator – Ashton Hall
Lifetime Achievement – DJ Khaled
Creator of the Year – David Dobrik
Top Beauty Creator – Leilani Green
Top Lifestyle Creator – Ari Fletcher
Top Athlete Creator – Dwight Howard
Top Music Creator – Leon Thomas
Top Food Creator – Jack Mancuso
Top Fashion Creator – Ashley Graham
Top Comedy Creator – LaLa Milan
Top On-Camera Correspondent – Lauren Ashley Beck
Top Gamer Creator – Dimucc
Top Family Creator – Justus and Kayla Tucker
Top Fitness Creator – Katie Austin
Google, owner of YouTube, and Meta, owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, had been found liable in a notable case on childhood social media addiction. A jury in Los Angeles, California found that the two tech companies had deliberately built addictive social media applications that harmed the mental health of the 20-year-old plaintiff, according to BBC News. Both Meta and Google said they disagree with the court’s verdict and would be appealing the decision, releasing separate statements to news organizations about the case. The plaintiff in the case, known as “Kaley” or “KGM”, was awarded $6 million in damages, $3 million each in compensatory and punitive damages, with Meta expected to pay 70% of damages and Google the leftover 30% owed. The ruling could have major implications in many similar social media cases currently being tried across the United States.
Although Google was a defendant in the case through its platform YouTube, the case focused primarily on Meta, specifically because of Instagram. Notably, Meta chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified before the court in February in his first appearance in front of a jury. Snap and TikTok settled with the plaintiff for undisclosed amounts before the case went to trial. The lawsuit for “Kailey” is the first in a region-wide consolidated case (where a court merges multiple lawsuits) of roughly 2,500 against the four tech and social media giants, Meta, Google, Snap and TikTok. In an unrelated but notable case, Elon Musk’s XAI, parent company of X (formerly Twitter) is currently being sued by the city of Baltimore, Maryland over allegations of sexually explicit images generated by its AI agent Grok.
The plaintiff said that she started using Instagram at nine years old and was using YouTube at age six, without being blocked from using either platform. She went on to claim that she stopped interacting with her family and began having symptoms of anxiety and depression at age 10. She was reportedly diagnosed with both conditions later by a therapist. According to the Associated Press, Meta argued that the mental health struggles faced by Kaley were unrelated to her social media use. Lawyers for YouTube argued that their platform was more like television than a social media platform, also pointing to company data they said showed that Kaley’s usage of the platform had declined over time. Both companies emphasized the safety features of their platforms, echoing similar statements from Zuckerberg during his February testimony.
The Los Angeles case comes just a day after a jury in New Mexico ordered Meta to pay $375 million. The company was found liable for misleading users about the safety of its platforms Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. Another California court case involving social media platforms and alleged harm to minors is also scheduled to start this month. The UK, Australia and Indonesia are also restricting access to social media for children. Indonesia will ban social media for children under 16 starting March 28, with a similar law for people under 16 in Australia already in place. In the UK, a pilot program testing social media time limits, digital curfews and bans is currently underway. Slovenia, Spain, France, Germany and Denmark are also moving to ban social media for minors. Today’s ruling is likely to influence other court cases around the country as governments around the world are considering limiting social media access for children.
