Money
Inside Unilever’s 24/7 Creator Hub for the World Cup
Unilever put 50,000-plus creators on the World Cup payroll and built a 24/7 content command center to run them. The format, not the spend, is what rewrites the deal.
Unilever is putting more than 50,000 creators to work at the FIFA World Cup 2026, the company said, the largest sports partnership activation in its history and the first real test of a marketing budget it has rebuilt around social.
The number anchors a structural change. Unilever said it is activating 35-plus brands across 120-plus markets, supported by 180-plus limited-edition products, with more than 50,000 creators going live with cross-market, cross-channel content over the tournament’s 39 days.
For the creator economy, the format is the story. A non-endemic sponsor is no longer buying a broadcast spot and a logo board. It is buying a creator operation, and that changes how the people inside it get paid.
The Command Center Is the Product
The centerpiece is The Locker Room, which Unilever describes as a 24/7 social media hub built to deliver real-time responsive content across TikTok and YouTube. It is staffed by creator experts, community specialists, and football strategists.
Unilever describes the hub as running at the speed of culture, with those teams delivering reactive content in real time as matches unfold.
The physical layer is House of Fresh, in-person creator hubs in three host cities: Mexico City, New York, and Miami. The spaces are purpose-built for social-first content creation and commerce, not for hospitality.
That distinction matters. A hospitality suite entertains clients; a content hub manufactures posts.
What Always-On Does to the Pay Structure
The shift here is from a one-off media spike to a standing operation, and that rewrites the deal. A per-post fee pays a creator for a single deliverable. A staffed, always-on hub treats creator output the way a newsroom treats a desk: continuous, briefed, on call.
Sarah Potter, Unilever Personal Care’s influencer and media director, framed the logic of the model. The partnership, she told Marketing Week, “enables the opportunity to build momentum and consistency rather than activating the tournament as a one-off media spike.”
The economics follow the format. Reactive content produced over 39 days looks less like a campaign buy and more like a retainer with a production quota attached.
Unilever CEO Fernando Fernandez said in 2025 that the company would move 50% of its marketing investment into social and influencers, up from 30%. The World Cup is the first major global test of that decision.
That single reallocation moves real money toward creators as a class, not toward one creator as a headline.
The Named-Roster Model Sits Right Next to It
Dove Men+Care, a Unilever brand, shows the other end of the structure. Its World Cup roster names ten creators: Marshawn Lynch, Trinity Rodman, Karl-Anthony Towns, Jordyn Woods, Matt King, Speedy Morman, Victor Cruz, Edwin Castro, Leo Gonzalez, and Devin Caherly.
Those names produce original content tied to fan rituals and match-day routines, supported by host-city activations. It is the clearest on-record version of the creator-as-embedded-staff deal at a major sporting event: a fixed roster with original briefs, not a one-time post.
Afke van de Klashorst, Unilever Personal Care’s vice president of integrated brand experience, described the ambition in the company’s announcement: “Our ambition is for our brands to show up in spaces where fandom lives and in ways that are authentic, native to social, and meaningful by bringing freshness and confidence to matchday moments that matter most for fans, players and spectators.”
Both sides of the field get something here. The brand gets continuous, platform-native output it controls; the creators get a standing engagement instead of a single check that clears once and ends.
The World Cup runs through July 19. The hubs stay live until the final whistle, and the budget math behind them outlasts the tournament.
Money
Indian Artist Royalties on Spotify Rose 29% in 2025
Spotify’s India Loud & Clear report shows artist royalties up 29% in 2025, driven by independent regional-language creators. More than 40% of that money now comes from listeners outside India.
Royalties earned by Indian artists on Spotify rose 29% year over year in 2025, according to the India edition of the platform’s Loud & Clear report, published September 2. Every major Indian language contributed to the increase.
The growth ran fastest where the catalogs are smallest. Telugu royalties climbed over 120%. Marathi rose nearly 50%, Bengali nearly 40%, Malayalam over 30%, Hindi close to 30%, and Tamil 20%, all per the report.
Read that as a creator-economy story before a music-industry one. The people driving this surge are independent, regional-language artists who now reach paying listeners without a label or a broadcaster deciding first. Spotify launched in India in 2019. Six years later, cultural specificity is the asset.
The distribution mechanics matter here. Streaming royalties pay out from a shared pool based on a track’s share of total plays, so a Haryanvi or Malayalam song that would never clear radio can still convert niche demand into recurring income. The report puts more than 40% of all royalties earned by Indian artists in 2025 as coming from listeners outside India.
That is the export line, and it is the one worth watching.
The Money Reaches Deeper Than the Charts
The gains are not stacking only at the top. Spotify said the number of Indian artists earning more than INR 10 million a year grew 21% year over year. The number clearing INR 50 million has more than doubled since 2023, per the report.
The 29% figure also outpaces Spotify’s global royalty growth of more than 10% for the same period, Music Ally reported. India is growing at nearly triple the platform’s overall rate.
Volume backs the payouts. Listeners streamed Indian artists nearly 335 billion times in 2025, more than 20 billion hours of music, per the report. Fans pressed play on an Indian artist they had never heard before 12.8 billion times, up 14% over 2024, Music Ally reported.
Discovery is what feeds a long tail of small earners rather than a handful of stars.
Independent Releases Now Set the Ceiling
The old gatekeeper was the film soundtrack. That is shifting. I-Pop, popular Indian music released outside Bollywood soundtracks, took half of Spotify’s 2025 year-end top 10 in India, and 90% of tracks on the Top 50 India chart came from Indian artists, per the report.
Aditya Rikhari’s track “Sahiba” held No. 1 on Spotify in India for more than 11 consecutive weeks, per the report. On Spotify’s 2025 Global Impact List, 11 of the top 15 most exported Indian songs came from artists outside a film soundtrack.
Rikhari framed the shift in plain terms. “Streaming changed the scale of what was possible for me as an independent artist,” he said in the report.
Spotify is spending to keep the pipeline full. The company expanded its RADAR artist-development program to Malayalam in 2025, following earlier rollouts for Punjabi and Tamil. Dhruvank Vaidya, Head of Music and Podcast at Spotify India, cast the platform’s role as plumbing rather than kingmaking.
“The audience was always there; what Spotify built was the infrastructure to surface it, monetize it, and ensure artists earned from it,” he said in the report.
Haryanvi shows what that plumbing does. Streams grew nearly sevenfold from February 2023 to February 2026, and close to 100 Haryanvi acts now rank among Spotify India’s top 5,000 artists, per the report.
The next data point to watch is that 40% export share. If it keeps climbing, the growth story stops being about India’s listeners and starts being about India’s balance of trade in music.
Money
Sticki Rolls Built a Billion-View Toy Brand, No Ads
A wearable-sticker toy brand cleared a billion YouTube views and reached 60-plus countries without buying a single traditional toy ad. Now it is testing whether a screen-native fandom converts on a store shelf.
Sticki Rolls, the wearable-sticker toy brand co-founded by Josh Loerzel and Lev Nelson in 2023, has cleared more than one billion YouTube views since its 2024 launch without spending on traditional toy advertising, according to a strategy feature from Modern Retail. The brand’s own channel now sits at nearly 1.9 million subscribers.
That is the whole business, run backward.
Most toy brands buy attention, then chase distribution. Sticki Rolls built the attention first, through creator unboxings and trading-haul videos, and treated retail as the second act. For the next wave of product brands aimed at Gen Alpha, the sequence is the point: the audience became the marketing budget, and the marketing budget was never spent.
The mechanics matter here. Jazwares, the manufacturing partner, licenses and distributes the brand, meaning Sky Castle Toys owns the concept and Jazwares carries the factory and shelf risk. Sky Castle Toys and Jazwares announced a multi-year partnership covering North America and Europe in December 2024, months after the product debuted at VidCon.
The retail footprint arrived on that content foundation. Sticki Rolls first sold through specialty toy stores and Amazon, then entered Target, and in late 2025 expanded into Walmart, its biggest retailer to date. It is now available in more than 60 countries.
The distribution reads as conventional. The demand engine underneath it does not.
Earlier this month the brand ran its first New York pop-up at Chillhouse, a SoHo nail studio, on August 7 and 8. The two-day event welcomed nearly 1,000 guests and gave out more than 500 complimentary sticker manicures. Google Trends showed searches for Sticki Rolls up 50 percent against the prior week and 130 percent against the prior month, per Modern Retail.
The pop-up doubled as a product preview. Guests got an early look at Sticki Mates, a collectible bag-charm format that extends the brand past its signature sticker bracelets.
The people who drive the videos showed up in person too. Anna Altamirano and Erin Degan, the Kawaii artists behind the original Sticki Rolls collection, appeared as brand ambassadors, a role the company distinguishes from its founders. Their own YouTube channel has 775,000 subscribers.
Michelle Wong, senior vice president of global marketing at Jazwares, framed the analog product as the draw. “It’s young girls’ form of self-expression and an extension of how they connect and meet other girls,” she said.
Wong tied the in-person events back to the numbers on the screen. “We believe by combining the digital and in-real-life experiences, we’re deepening that brand love and emotional connections with the fans,” she said.
The bet worth watching is the conversion. A billion views is reach; a Walmart endcap is a purchase. The next test is whether the brand’s Series 3 and Sticki Mates lines carry the pop-up spike into repeat sales across those 60-plus markets.
Money
Creators Get Real C-Suite Titles at Four Brands
Blenders handed Jordan Howlett a Chief Content Officer title with actual authority over product and creative. Four brands are now testing whether an executive seat is the creator economy’s next paycheck.
Blenders Eyewear made Jordan Howlett, the creator known to 50 million followers as Jordan the Stallion, its first-ever Chief Content Officer on July 23, the first executive title the San Diego brand has built for a creator.
The title is not a nameplate. Blenders said Howlett works directly with its marketing, creative, and product teams, overseeing creative development, campaign ideation, product storytelling, and social-first programming. He is in the room where product decisions get made, not fronting the ad after they are made.
That distinction is the whole story for the creator economy. For a decade, a creator’s ceiling was a brand deal: a fee, a term, a post. An operating title moves a creator from renting out an audience to helping run the business that borrows it, which is a different kind of leverage and a different long-term trajectory.
Howlett is not the only one. A Digiday analysis published August 21 gathered four of these appointments into a single trend and named it: the creator ambassador is becoming a creator executive.
In the spring, creator and comedian Jack Shane was made chief creative officer of German candy company Katjes, brought on to grow it in the United States. Soft-drink brand Cool Sips named reality-TV star and creator Whitney Leavitt its chief creative and brand officer. Cherub, an investment platform connecting creators with startups, named entrepreneur Nadya Okamoto its chief creator officer earlier this summer to help source deals.
Each title claims real input rather than a signature and a paycheck.
The Difference Between a Title and a Seat
The old version of this had a name and a reputation. Gemma Collins called herself creative director at Canva. Dhar Mann was the NFL’s chief kindness officer. Olivia Nell became ASOS’s “out of office” director. Those were vanity titles, marketing costumes worn for a launch, and Digiday drew the line between them and the new roles that carry strategic input.
The mechanics matter here, because the word “executive” is doing heavy lifting. A vanity title is a fee dressed up. An operating title comes with standing authority over decisions that outlast any one campaign, and sometimes with equity that ties the creator’s upside to the company’s. The first pays once. The second compounds.
Not every appointment clears that bar, and one of the four named openly does not. Okamoto told Marketing Brew her Cherub role is advisory, not operational, the clearest stress-test of the genuine-authority thesis. A title can signal a real seat or paper over a partnership, and the label alone does not tell you which.
Lily Comba, founder and CEO of influencer agency Superbloom, put the skeptic’s case plainly in the Digiday piece. Some of these appointments, she said, are a partnership with a fancier title, announced alongside a product launch and then quiet after.
What the Brands Are Actually Buying
Blenders CEO Jack Gray framed the logic as ownership, not rental. “You see a lot of creative director roles, but you don’t really see very many content roles, and that was by design,” Gray told Digiday, explaining that he did not want to rent a customer or rent culture.
The economics behind the title stayed private. Blenders confirmed the partnership is multi-year and its biggest to date, and it confirmed Howlett is a partner of the brand, not a full employee. It did not disclose financial terms.
That structure is the tell. A partner with an executive title and undisclosed terms sits somewhere between a vendor and an owner, and where exactly is the number no one is releasing yet.
What Digiday identifies as the macro shift is a budget reclassification: CMOs and now CEOs treating creator spend as strategic capital rather than ad spend. When the money moves from the marketing line to the strategy line, the person attached to it moves too.
Blenders said Howlett’s first major video exceeded all internal KPIs. The next number to watch is the one that decides whether these titles become a category: whether a creator with a real seat outperforms a creator with a fee, on a spreadsheet the finance team keeps.
